| ORAL REPORT — GRADING CHECKLIST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Team: |
|
|
|
| Date: |
|
Evaluator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Points |
Score |
|
| Technical Content (60%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Topic mastery, including technical correctness |
20 |
|
|
| All requested deliverables included |
15 |
|
|
| Appropriate level of detail |
15 |
|
|
| Completeness of analysis and interpretation of data |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Organization (15%) |
15 |
|
|
| Introduction clearly identifies purpose, approach, and preview of main points |
|
|
|
| Content is clearly organized and supports the purpose |
|
|
|
| Conclusion provides clear, memorable summary of design |
|
|
|
| Introduction and conclusion are tailored appropriately to the audience |
|
|
|
| Presenters respond to questions clearly, sufficiently, and succinctly |
|
|
|
| Presentation includes logical transitions from one presenter to another |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presentation (15%) |
15 |
|
|
| Presenters are professional in their dress, language, and style |
|
|
|
| Movement, eye contact, & gestures enhance presentation and do not distract from it |
|
|
|
| Vocal quality is varied and illustrates interest in topic and design work |
|
|
|
| Presenters speak with appropriate pace & volume |
|
|
|
| Presenters make reference to other parts of the presentation and connect their part to the whole |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Layout/Visuals (10%) |
10 |
|
|
| Visuals are clear, consistent, readable and understandable |
|
|
|
| Visuals accurately follow the oral presentation and provide “visual map” of presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comments:
|
